|
Beach response to high energy wave climate. A case study in the portuguese west coast Jorge Manuel do Rosario Trindade C e n t r o de E s t u d o s G e o g r á f i c o s F a c u l d a d e de Letras d a U n i v e r s i d a d e de L i s b o a j o r g e t r d @ u n i v - a b . p t Ana Paula Ribeiro Ramos-Pereira C e n t r o d e E s t u d o s G e o g r á f i c o s F a c u l d a d e de Letras d a U n i v e r s i d a d e d e L i s b o a anarp@fl.ul.pt Mario Rui Nunes Neves C e n t r o d e E s t u d o s G e o g r á f i c o s F a c u l d a d e de Letras da U n i v e r s i d a d e de L i s b o a inario.neves@ceg.ul.pt Territoris (2007-2008). 7: 21-38 Territoris Universitat de les Illes Balears 2007-2008. Núm. 7. pp. 21-38 ISSN: 1139-2169 BEACH RESPONSE TO HIGH ENERGY WAVE CLIMATE. A CASE STUDY IN THE PORTUGUESE WEST COAST J o r g e M a n u e l d o R o s a r i o T r i n d a d e A n a Paula Ribeiro R a m o s - P e r e i r a M a r i o Rui N u n e s N e v e s ABSTRACT: Portugal's vvestern coast is a wave-dominated rocky coast with a semidiurnal mesotidal regime. The wave climate is highly conditioned hy the Atlantic Ocean's atmospheric circulation. which results in a seasonal change in wave patterns. Storms arc freqüent during winter and can reach 10-m wave heights with a 5-year recurrence period. Four profile monitoring campaigns were carried oul in December 2005. January and May 2006 using a dGPS and a total station to evalúate the response of three differem beach systems to high wave climate events. comparíng pre-storm wave. morphology and sediment characlerislics with the modifications induced in the system after the storm event. A series of 64 beach profiles is analysed in terms of sediment textural propenies. volume. slope. surf similarity Índex and dimensionless full velocity parameters' variability. Each beach system's modal and límit morphological behaviours are established according to Wright and Short's morphodynamic model. KEY WORDS: Beach profile. storm event. system morphodynamic range. RESUMEN: La costa oeste de Portugal es una costa rocosa dominada por olas y con un régimen mesomareal semidiurno. El clima marítimo está altamente condicionado por la circulación atmosférica del océano Atlántico y presenta una variabilidad estacional en el régimen de oleaje. Las tormentas son frecuentes durante el invierno y pueden alanzar alturas de ola de 10 m con una recurrència de 5 años. Se han hecho cuatro campañas de control en tres playas, mediante el uso de GPS diferencial y estación total con el objetivo de evaluar su respuesta a sendos episodios de alta energía. Se comparan los cambios en la morfología y en la textura sedimentaria antes y después de cada temporal. Para ello se realizaron 64 perfiles de playa y se han analizado las variaciones en la textura del sedimento, el volumen, la pendiente, el índice de surf similarity y el parámetro adimensional de caída del sedimento. Con todo ello ha podido establecerse el comportamiento morfológico modal y extremo de dichas playas según el modelo de Wright y Short. PALABRAS CLAVE: Perfiles de playa, temporales, variaciones del sistema morl'odinámico. T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s . M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. 1. Introduction d o m i n a n t w a v e p a t t e r n s a l o n g t h e c o a s t occur in 265 days of the year (Costa, 1994) B e a c h e n v i r o n m e n t s a r e t h e r e s u l t of a n d t h e m e a n o f f s h o r e s i g n i f i c a n t w a v e s e v e r a l f o r c i n g f a c t o r s w h i c h act p e r - height is 2,5m in winter and I.Om in s u m m e r manently changing profile m o r p h o l o g y and ( O l i v e i r a P i r e s . 1 9 8 9 ) . C a r v a l h o ( 2 0 0 4 ) , b e a c h s h a p e . W a v e s , t i d e s a n d s e d i m e n t u s e d t h e w a v e n u m è r i c m o d e l M A R 3 G properties are amongst the main factors that ( O l i v e i r a P i r e s & C a r v a l h o . 1 9 9 6 ) a n d e x p l a i n t h o s e c h a n g e s . W h i l s t b e a c h m o - applied it to a 1998/2001 o c e a n - a t m o s p h e r i c p h o d y n a m i c s c a n b e d e f i n e d t h r o u g h c l i m a t e d a t a s e r i e s . H e e s t i m a t e d 8 seasonal cycles. the dramàtic c h a n g e s occur s t o r m s / y e a r in t h e w e s t - c e n t r a l c o a s t of frequently during high energy events. T h e s e P o r t u g a l w i l h w a v e h e i g h t s a b o v e 4 m , c h a n g e s a r e v e r y s i g n i f i c a n t for l o c a l m o s t l y b e t w e e n O c t o b e r a n d A p r i l . T h e c o m m u n i t i e s b e c a u s e o f t h e i m p o r t a n t main directions of high w a v e climate fnund d a m a g e costs, namely in beach facilities. by C a r v a l h o ( 2 0 0 4 ) w e r e W ( 6 7 , 3 % ) and T h e m a g n i t u d e of m o r p h o l o g i c a l N W ( 2 7 , 4 % ) . Considering storms with w a v e c h a n g e s in wave d o m i n a t e d e x p o s e d beach heights over 6m. the W direction was found systems are closely related to the capacity of in 89,3'/f of t h e o c c u r r e n c e s . H o w e v e r , t h e o u t e r b a r s u b - s y s t e m to a b s o r b a n d storm w a v e s from S W are less freqüent but d i s s i p a t e w a v e e n e r g y b e f o r e it r e a c h e s they usually h a v e a h i g h e r m a g n i t u d e and beach face. This capacity can be e x c e e d e d if c a n r e a c h h e i g h t s of 10 - 12m ( P e r e i r a , t h e f r e q u e n c y of s t o r m o c c u r r e n c e o v e r - 1999: T a b o r d a et al. 1992). E x t r e m e w a v e c o m e s t h e t i m e n e e d e d f o r t h e s y s t e m h e i g h t s a b o v e lOm can be r e a c h e d with a recovery. r e c u r r e n c e p e r i o d of 5 y e a r s ( C a r v a l h o . T h e aim of this vvork is to evalúate the 1992). r e s p o n s e of S t a . R i t a . A z u l a n d F o z d o C o a s t a l drift is u s u a l l y d i r e c t e d to the L i z a n d r o b e a c h e s to h i g h w a v e c l i m a t e south along the West coast. although Pereira e v e n t s t h r o u g h m o r p h o s e d i m e n t a r y v a - ( 1 9 9 1 ) r e f e r s that in c a s e s of s t r o n g S W riability analysis and to establish modal and w a v e c l i m a t e the s o u t h w a r d s c o a s t a l drift l i m i t m o r p h o l o g i c a l b e h a v i o u r s o f t h i s may invert locally its direction. Several field systems. and numérica! based estimates of longshore t r a n s p o n r a t e in t h e w e s t e r n c o a s t o f Portugal have been m a d e a range b e t w e e n 2. Study site framework 1.0 x l O and 2.3x10" mVyear (Oliveira et al. 6 1982; B e t t e n c o u r t . P. & A n g e l o . C . 1992; T h e western coast of Portugal, b e t w e e n T a b o r d a . 1 9 9 3 : V i d i n h a et al. 1 9 9 7 : P e n i c h e and C a s c á i s , is a w a v e d o m i n a t e d L a r a n g e i r o . 2002). Most of those estimates r o c k y coast with a s e m i - d i u r n a l m e s o t i d a l are related lo the central-northern sector of r e g i m e . Tidal w a v e p r o p a g a t e s n o r t h w a r d s the P o r t u g u e s e c o a s t . b e t w e e n N a z a r é and and reaches its m á x i m u m amplitude at circa O p o r t o (Fig. 2). 4 m . The Cascáis tidal gauge data s h o w s that T h e c o a s t l i n e b e t w e e n P e n i c h e a n d in 1998 the e x t r e m e w a t e r l e v é i s r e a c h e d Cascáis is a limestone cliff d o m i n a n t with a 4.03()m and the mean spring tide amplitude lack of sediment supply from local sources w a s 3,075m (Fig. 1). W a v e climate is highly and from longshore drift sediment d y n a m i c s . c o n d i t i o n e d by the A t l a n t i c O c e a n a t m o s - S o u t h w a r d s longshore drift is interrupted by p h e r i c c i r c u l a t i o n r e s u l t i n g in a s e a s o n a l the s u b m e r g e d N a z a r é c a n y o n and by the c h a n g e of t h e w a v e p a t t e r n s . N o r t h w e s t Peniche headland (Fig. 2). 24 Territoris, núm. 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach response to high energy wave climate. T i ï n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s , M . T h e Peniche - Cascáis continental shelf, T h e e x p o s e d beach s y s t e m s are n a r r o w , between Om and - 5 0 m , is mainly c o m p o s e d e m b a y e d or a s s o c i a t e d w i t h small infilled of r o c k o u t c r o p s a n d c o a r s e s e d i m e n t valleys as a result of the Holocene sea level d e p o s i t s w i t h h i g h l e v é i s of b i o g e n i c rise. and their importance in the overall costal remains. Fine sands and m u d s are found in systems of the study area decrease southwards. v e r y c o n f i n e d a n d s h e l t e r e d a r e a s in t h e T h r e e b e a c h - d u n e s y s t e m s , different in E r i c e i r a s e a . T h e r e f o r e . l o c a l s e d i m e n t size and shape. bul similar in the exposure to sources are scarce due to (i) continental shelf W s t o r m y w a v e c l i m a t e . w e r e c h o s e n to m o r p h o l o g y a n d d e p o s i t s , ( i i ) l i t t l e ¡ I l ú s t r a t e t h e b e a c h - s y s t e m s ' m o r p h o - c o n t r i b u t i o n f r o m t h e s m a l l r i v e r b a s i n s d y n a m i c s . T h e y a r e a l s o i n c l u d e d in a (Pereira, 1987) and (iii) the carbonate nature monthly monitoring p r o g r a m m e being held of the rocks that constitute the cliff systems at the «Centro de Estudos Geográficos» for (Neves, 2004). over two years. H i g h ( m ) L o w (m) e s T 4.030 0.070 m s T 3.672 0.597 m n T 2.902 1.447 Figure 1. Tidal range in the Cascáis tide gauge ( 3 8 ° 4 1 ' 3 9 , 1 7 1 " N ; 0 9 ° 2 5 0 5 , 2 2 9 " W - heights - above chart d a t u m ) , 0 1 - 0 1 - 1 9 9 8 / 3 1 - 1 2 - 1 9 9 8 . esT - e x t r e m e spring tide: msT - m e a n spring tide; mnT- m e a n neap tide: msl - m e a n sea level. T h e Sta. Rita b e a c h is a m i x e d b e a c h - 2 0 0 m in w i d t h and has a v e r y small d u n e d u n e / b e a c h - c l i f f s y s t e m ( F i g . 2 - a ) . T h e field. highly d a m a g e d by h u m a n trampling. b e a c h - d u n e c o m p o n e n t of t h e s y s t e m is Azul b e a c h (Fig. 2-b) is the largest b e a c h - 55()m l o n g and 1 5 0 - 2 0 0 m w i d e , w h i l e the d u n e s y s t e m . 19()0m long and 9 7 5 m w i d e b e a c h - c l i f f part is lOOOm l o n g a n d lOOm and is the only one of the three affected by wide. F o z do Lizandro beach (Fig. 2-c) is a o v e r w a s h e s . b e a c h - d u n e s y s t e m 6 0 0 m in l e n g t h a n d Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 2 5 T r i n d a d e , J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a , A. y N e v e s , M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. Figure 2. The study área, a - Sta. Rita beach: b - Azul beach: c - Foz d o Lizandro beach; Le - Leixòes offshore w a v e buoy; Sn - Sines offshore w a v e buoy. 3. Methodology c o n s i d e r e d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of t h e l o c a l h y d r o d y n a m i c i n f l u e n c e in s e d i m e n t Four monitoring c a m p a i g n s were carried t r a n s p o r t d u r i n g t h e h i g h w a v e c l i m a t e o u t in p r e - s t o r m a n d r i g h t a f t e r s t o r m event. conditions ( D e c e m b e r of 2 0 0 5 , January and Total station and d G P S units were used to M a y of 2 0 0 6 ) on t h e t r e e b e a c h s y s t e m s , m e a s u r e e m e r g e d b e a c h v o l u m è t r i c a n d resulting in 64 survey profiles (table 1). T h e m o r p h o m e t r i c c h a n g e s . T h e d i f f e r e n c e s s t o r m m o r p h o l o g i c a l a n d s e d i m e n t p a r a - b e t w e e n t h e t w o t e c h n i q u e s p r o v é to b e m e t e r s m e a s u r e d 3 or 4 d a y s after s t o r m negligible in this dynamic context (Trindade p e a k s in e a r l y J a n u a r y a n d l a t e M a y a r e et al, 2007). As part of a beach monitoring 26 Territoris, núm. 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach response to high energy wave climate. T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a , A. y N e v e s . M . p r o g r a m m e , b e a c h p r o f ï l e n u m b e r a n d c o r r e s p o n d s to a b o u n d a r y b e t w e e n marine spacing were initially defined to record data and aeolian d y n a m i c s . This boundary point. f r o m t h e b e a c h f a c e a n d b e r m m o r p h o - that we can call a knick point, was accessed dynamics. b y t h e d i r e c t o v e r l a p of all t h e o b t a i n e d B e a c h p r o f i l e s a r e a n c h o r e d in f i x e d beach profiles. p o i n t s a w a y from the h y d r o d y n a m i c area, S e v e r a l i n t e r p o l a t i o n m e t h o d s w e r e e n s u r i n g o v e r l a p p i n g b e t w e e n c a m p a i g n s tested with the field data of M a y c a m p a i g n (Trindade et al, 2006). in order to calcúlate beach profile v o l u m e . Beach m o r p h o d y n a m i c s w a s accessed by namely inverse distance to a p o w e r of two, v o l u m e variability a l o n g e a c h profile with k r i g i n g . n e a r e s t n e i g h b o u r a n d m o v i n g an a s s u m e d width of 0, l m . T h e v o l u m e of a v e r a g e . T e s t results e x p r e s s e d in T a b l e 2 each profile w a s calculated a b o v e m e a n sea r e v e a l e d that K r i g i n g is the m o s t a c c u r a t e l e v e l ( m s l ) a n d b e l o w t h e p o i n t of n o t e c h n i q u e , w i t h the l o w e s t r e s i d u a l v à l u e s r e l a t i v e h y d r o d y n a m i c s a n d m o v e m e n t . b o t h in h e i g h t a n d v o l u m e c a l c u l a t i o n s usually associated with the inland backshore ( A R H = 0 , 3 0 0 m ; A R V = - l , 6 8 5 m ) a n d 3 or backshore/foredune limit (Ferreira. 1998: t h e r e f o r e t h e m o s t s u i t a b l e f o r t h i s B a p t i s t a . 2 0 0 6 ) . T h e i n l a n d b e a c h profile c a m p a i g n s profile volumetry. limits is not e a s y to e s t a b l i s h and often it Table 1. Monitoring c a m p a i g n s . S". Rita beach Azul beach Foz do Lizandro beach 1 Sediment Sediment Sediment Date Profiles Date Profiles Date Profiles Satnples Samples Samples 17,12.05 5 4 16.12.05 6 4 15.12.05 5 4 i Pre-storm) 04.01.06 5 3 02.01.06 6 .ï 03.01.06 5 4 (Storm) 14.05.06 5 4 15.05.06 6 4 12.05.06 S 4 (Pre-storm) 28.05.06 5 4 26.05.06 6 3 25.05.06 5 3 (Storm) T a b l e 2. R e s i d u a l v à l u e s of h e i g h t and v o l u m e . A R H - A v e r a g e residual h e i g h t : A R V - A v e r a g e residual v o l u m e . A R H height (ni) A R V (m') Inverse distance 0.069 -2.716 Kriging 0.030 -1.685 Nearest neighbour 0.048 -3.308 Moving average 0.965 -74.352 Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 2 7 T r i n d a d e , J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s , M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. S e d i m e n t o l o g i c a l a n a l y s e s of b e a c h l i m i t of t h e s u r v e y e d p r o f i l e . in e a c h s a n d s w e r e c a r r i e d o u t w i t h 4 4 s a m p l e s c a m p a i g n ; (Table 1) taken from the berm. beach face, H is the breaker w a v e significant height. h base of the beach face and low tide terrace expressed in meters a b o v e cel, obtained from ( w h e n e x i s t e n t ) d u r i n g e a c h c a m p a i g n , in the K o m a r and G a u g h a n (1972) expression order to evalúate grain size distribution and based on the Leixòes offshore w a v e data: statistical p a r a m e t e r s . A p p r o x i m a t e l y 6 0 g H = 0,39g (T * H*)° b 02 (2) f r o m e a c h s a m p l e w e r e w a s h e d , w i t h o u t c a l c i u m c a r b o n a t e d e s t r u c t i o n , a n d d r y W h e r e : s i e v e d b e t w e e n -2.0<j) ( 4 , 0 m m ) a n d 4,5<ji H is t h e o f f s h o r e w a v e s i g n i f i c a n t ü ( 0 , 0 4 4 m m ) . in 0,5<p intervals, and w e i g h e d height. expressed in meters above cd; w i t h a 0 , 0 1 g a c c u r a c y . T h e S E D M A C / - 0,39 is the empirical coefficient based on S E D P C w o r k s h e e t ( H e n r i q u e s , 2 0 0 4 ) w a s laboratory and field data from M u n k (1949) u s e d t o c a l c ú l a t e t h e m e a n . S t a n d a r d a n d c o n f i r m e d l a t e r as a g o o d p r e d i c t i v e d e v i a t i o n a n d s k e w n e s s of e a c h s a m p l e . coefficient by W e i s h a r and Byrne (1978); a c c o r d i n g to the M e t h o d of M o m e n t s of L„ is the deep water wave-length which. Friedman and Sanders (1978). b a s e d o n l i n e a r w a v e t h e o r y , c a n be O f f s h o r e w a v e s i g n i f i c a n t (//,) a n d calculated as: m á x i m u m (//„„„.) height. expressed in meters a b o v e chart d a t u m (cel « -2m msl), p e r i o d (T) and wave direction (r7 ) w e r e provided 2n (3) í / / r by the Leixòes buoy, one of the two offshore w a v e buoys available on the west coast of T h e D i m e n s i o n l e s s fall v e l o c i t y Portugal (Fig. 2). p a r a m e t e r (Q) w a s calculated a c c o r d i n g to W a v e breaker type and m o r p h o d y n a m i c the Wright and Short (1984) formula: classification w a s accessed with widely used p a r a m e t e r s . n a m e l y t h e s u r f s i m i l a r i t y (4) p a r a m e t e r o r I r i b a r r e n N u m b e r (£[,,) f o r b r e a k e r w a v e c o n d i t i o n s a n d t h e d i m e n s i o n l e s s fall velocity (Q) ( M a s s e l i n k W h e r e : & H e g g e , 1 9 9 5 : B e n a v e n t e et a l , 2 0 0 2 ; \\\\\\ is t h e s e d i m e n t fall v e l o c i t y . B e n e d e t . F i n k l & K l e i n . 2 0 0 4 : B e n e d e t , e x p r e s s e d in m / s . H a l l e r m e i e r ( 1 9 8 1 a.b) Finkl. Campbell & Klein. 2004; Goodfellow e m p i r i c a l f o r m u l a s for w w e r e u s e d to s & Stephenson, 2 0 0 5 : Anfuso & B e n a v e n t e , o b t a i n t h e fall v e l o c i t y of t h e s e d i m e n t 2006). samples: T h e s u r f s i m i l a r i t y p a r a m e t e r w a s calculated according to Battjes, 1974: 0.7 (Ps-P)g 1 _ 0 ( ) M W. = P (5) (D W /L ? (Ps-P)gü (6) 3 b 0 A = 51) pv2 W h e r e : tan/3 is the beach slope calculated from W h e r e : t h e a v e r a g e s l o p e of t h e b e a c h p r o f i l e s , p is the sediment density (=2,648 g / c m s 3 b e t w e e n the b e r m c r e s t a n d the s e a w a r d for quartz grains and =2,8 for shell material). 28 Territoris, núm. 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach respon.se to high energy wave climate. Trindade. J.. Ramos-Pereira, A. y Neves. M. p is t h e d e n s i t y of t h e s e a w a t e r ( = 1.026 H o w e v e r . the beach is c o m p o s e d of '-everal g / c m at l 5 C - 33 p p t ) , u is the s e a w a t e r c o n s t a n t s l o p e a n g l e s a s s o c i a t e d to t h e 3 a kinematic viscosity (=0.0119 c m 2 / s at 15 C d i f f e r e n t d y n a m i c s u b u n i t s of t h e b e a c h . a - 33 ppt), g is gravity acceleration (981cm/s) Because the s u b m e r g e d profile is absent in a n d D is t h e P a s s e g a ( 1 9 5 7 ) s e d i m e n t this study, m e a n b e a c h slope is c a l c u l a t e d S(I median size, in centimetres. The Hallermeier for t h e m o s t d y n a m i c a t e a s of t h e b e a c h f o r m u l a t i o n for w ( e q . 5) w a s t e s t e d on profile. including berm crest. beach face and s p r e v i o u s l y p u b l i s h e d s e t t l i n g v e l o c i t y low tide terrace, when present. m e a s u r e m e n t s of s a n d s w i t h a d i a m e t e r range between 0 , 1 2 5 m m and l.Omm. T h e quartz/shell content of the s a m p l e s 4. Results was used to calcúlate the final result for the w e i g h t e d a r i t h m e t i c a l m e a n o f W . s January and May c a m p a i g n s were prece- concerning the different valúes of p . s ded by two high w a v e climate events recor- T h e s e types of d i m e n s i o n l e s s p a r a m e t e - ded entirely or partiallv. in the two existing rizations are fully related to beach behavior w a v e b u o y s (Leixòes and Sines). Despite the and are useful tools to first access the range p r o x i m i t y to t h e s t u d y á r e a , it w a s o f b e a c h m o r p h o d y n a m i c s t a t e s . b u t impossible to use data from the Sines buoy c h o o s i n g the right p a r a m e t e r s to c a l c ú l a t e because of the several g a p s registered in the f o r m u l a e is d i f f i c u l t d u e to t h e i r r e g u l a r January and late M a y records. This m a d e it nature of the beach system d y n a m i c s . unable to correlate and interpólate the Sines T h e r a n g e of v a l ú e s a s s u m e d for Q in d a t a w i t h t h e L e i x ò e s b u o y to fu 1 Ti 1 d a t a one system depend on the measured range of loss. s e d i m e n t s i z e . w h i c h u s u a l l y c o n t r o l s the T h e L e i x ò e s offshore w a v e data before i n t e r t i d a l s l o p e . a n d on c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the January 2 0 0 6 monitoring c a m p a i g n s w a s incident w a v e s w h i c h are the main driving very similar to the M a y 2 0 0 6 (Fig. 3). M e a n factor of beach d y n a m i c s . H valúes w a s 3.89m in January and 3.67m s Incident w a v e can be d e s c r i b e d by the in M a y . T r e g i s t e r e d a r a n g e of 16,3s in r a n g e of b r e a k e r t y p e s (t,,) that can o c c u r J a n u a r y a n d 14.6s in M a y . r e a c h i n g Tnun within a beach system. which are controlled 21,1 Os a n d 18.80s at the m á x i m u m s t o r m by beach slope and w a v e height and length strength (Table 3). H w a s p r e d o m i n a n t l y Jir ( K o m a r , 1998; Masselink & H u g h e s . 2003). from the N W quadrant with resultant vectors Table 3. High w a v e climate event data from Leixòes w a v e buoy. 3 0 - 1 2 - 2 0 0 5 - 16h 2 1 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 - 0 6 h to to 0 1 - 0 1 - 2 0 0 6 - 2 l h 2 3 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 - 12h T i m e (h) 53 54 //, (m-cd) 3.89 3,67 £ / ( m - cd) 9.77 10.77 m a x T(s) 8.54 8,38 21.10 18.80 Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 29 T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s . M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. of 310° in January and 309° in M a y (Fig. 3) m e a n of t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n t h e v o - w h i c h u s u a l l y m e a n s a s t r o n g s o u t h w a r d s luntes of all e m e r g e d beach profiles in each l o n g s h o r e d r i f t in t h e w e s t e r n c o a s t of s y s t e m a n d in t w o s e q u e n t i a l c a m p a i g n s . Portugal. T h e registered H is also perpen- M e a n v o l u n t e s a n d t h e s e d i m e n t b u d g e t d i r d i c u l a r t o t h e S . R i t a a n d A z u l b e a c h v a r i a b i l i t y ( m e a n and m á x i m u m ) b e t w e e n l a systems. The two high w a v e climate events c a m p a i g n s are expressed in Table 4. l a s t e d 5 3 h ( J a n u a r y ) a n d 5 4 h ( M a y ) a n d V a l ú e s of m e a n s e d i m e n t b u d g e t v a - H r e a c h e d 9 , 7 7 m a n d 1 0 , 7 7 m . r e s p e c - riability b e t w e e n c a m p a i g n s r a n g e from a m a x ti vely (Table 3). m á x i m u m e r o s i v e s e d i m e n t d y n a m i c s (- The m o r p h o d y n a m i c s of a beach system 3 9 9 , 5 1 9 m / m 3 ) in Foz do Lizandro beach to a m á x i m u m a c c r e t i o n a r y b e h a v i o u r in S ". c a n b e e x p r e s s e d in t e r m s of t h e m e a n 1 Rita beach ( 3 4 9 , 8 1 3 m / m 3 ) . both registered sediment budget ( S B in T a b l e 4) w h i c h . in m in January data. this study. is a s s u m e d to be the a r i t h m e t i c Figure 3. W a v e parameters from Leixòes w a v e buoy preceding monitoring c a m p a i g n s . 30 Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach response to high energy wave climate. T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A . y N e v e s . M . Table 4. Slope, v o l u m e and mean sediment size in the three beach systems. S m - slope (x 102 = % ) ; V m - mean v o l u m e ( m / m 3 ) ; S B m - mean sediment budget ( m / m 3 ) ; S B m a x - m á x i m u m variability of sediment budget ( m / m 3 ) ; T T s e d - m e a n sediment size of the tidal terrace ( m m ) ; B B F s e d - mean sediment size of the base of the beach face ( m m ) ; BFsed - mean sediment size of the beach face ( m m ) ; Bsed - mean sediment size of the berm ( m m ) ; Csed - c a m p a i g n average sediment size ( m m ) ; N p - not present. Date S„, V,„ SB TT„„ BUF,.,, BI'„„ c_ 17.12.2005 0,0512 806.133 Np 0.370 0.348 0.602 0.440 ( p r e -storm ) 349.81 3 1.093.261 04.01.2006 0.0472 1155,946 Np 0.537 0.363 0.400 0.433 S". Rita (storm) Beach 14.05.2006 0.0988 0.466 (pre-storm) 1648,873 0.715 0.542 0.571 0.573 -149.044 298.097 28.05.2006 0.0596 1499.829 0.551 0.475 0.517 0.484 0.507 (storm) 16.12.200? 0.0514 1391.846 0.417 0.549 0.580 Np 0.515 (pre-storm) -101.497 504.541 02.01.2006 0.0567 1290.348 0,473 0.434 0.428 Np 0.445 Azul (storm) Beach 15.05.2006 0.071 1 1033.670 0.746 0.742 0.437 Np 0.642 (pre-storm) 89.769 122.212 20.05.2006 0.0340 1123.439 0.525 0.855 0.506 Np 0.628 (storm) 15.12.2005 0.0725 2782.981 (1.714 0.443 0.498 0.544 0.550 (pre-storm) -399.519 1.289.503 03.01,2006 Faz (t z o (t 0.0444 2383.462 0.400 0.410 0.426 0.398 0.409 (storm) I.iznndro Beach 12.05.2006 h i 0.0826 2344.240 Np 0.544 0.42S 0.458 0.477 pre-storm) -90,591 1.523.128 25 1)5 2l«Ki 0.0601 2253.649 Np 0.536 0.364 0.395 0.431 (storm) Sa S .a Rita Beac a h 0.509 (1.524 0.445 0.514 Azul Beac l h 0.540 0.645 0.4SS Np I-'oz I-'o d z o Lizandr o o Heuc o h 0,557 0.483 0.429 0.449 Azul beach have the smallest variation in T h e s e d i m e n t c o l l e c t e d d u r i n g the four sediment budget variability. January erosión c a m p a i g n s is c h a r a c t e r i s e d b y m i d d l e ( - 1 0 1 . 4 9 7 m / m 3 ) is a l m o s t e q u i v a l e n t to m e d i u m to m i d d l e c o a r s e s a n d s ( T a b l e 4 ) May accretion (89.769 m / m 3 ) . w i t h s i z e s t h a t r a n g e f r o m 0 , 3 4 8 m m t o Differences in s y s t e m s r e s p o n s e s to the 0 , 8 5 5 m m . T h e l o w r a n g e o f m e a n s a n d s a m e energètic event can be m e a s u r e d also sizes, a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 . 2 5 0 . m a y be a s s o - with m á x i m u m sediment budget variability ciated to the high selectivity of the transport ( T a b l e 4 ) . T h e h i g h e s t m á x i m u m b u d g e t a g e n t a n d t o t h e h o m o g e n e i t y o f t h e value in January (1289.503 m / m in Foz d o sediment source. 3 L i z a n d r o b e a c h ) w a s 2,5 times h i g h e r than The D e c e m b e r - J a n u a r y sediments are in the value of Azul beach (504,541 m / m ) . In 3 a v e r a g e l o w e r w h e n c o m p a r e d to a v e r a g e May this relation rose to 12,5 times s h o w i n g s e d i m e n t s i z e f r o m t h e M a y c a m p a i g n s . t h e e x t r e m e d i f f e r e n c e s in t h e m o r p h o - exception m a d e for F o z d o Lizandro where d y n a m i c responses of this systems. overall m e a n sand size is slightly higher in M e a n beach slope variability (Table 4 ) is D e c e m b e r - J a n u a r y c a m p a i g n s (Table 4 ) . lower in Azul beach (3,717c). similar in F o z S u p e r i o r valúes of m e a n sand sizes c a n do L i z a n d r o b e a c h ( 3 . 8 2 % ) a n d h i g h e r in also be found in the tidal terrace (0,540mm in Sta. Rita beach ( 5 , 1 6 % ) . Azul beach and 0.557mm in Foz do Lizandro Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s , M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. b e a c h ) a n d in the b a s e of t h e b e a c h face a c c e s s i n g w a v e b r e a k e r c o n d i t i o n s a n d ( 0 , 5 2 4 m m in S . R i t a . 0 , 6 4 5 m m in A z u l m o r p h o d y n a m i c s t a t e of t h e b e a c h by t a b e a c h a n d ( ) . 4 8 3 m m in F o z d o L i z a n d r o formula and models is essential in order to b e a c h ) . T h e s e m o r p h o l o g i c a l e l e m e n t s are c o m p a r e t h e s y s t e m s r e s p o n s e to h i g h placed w e r e the w a v e b r e a k e r point m o v e s energy input during one or several episodes. back and forward durin» the high tide cycle. According to Wright and Short (1984) _ resulting in higher concentration of turbulence c l a s s i f i c a t i o n ( < 1 Í 2 r e f l e c t i v e ; 2Q - 5Q and wave energy dissipation. This differen- i n t e r m e d í a t e ; > 6 Í 2 d i s s i p a t i v e ) , t h e t h r e e tiation is not clear in the beach face and in the b e a c h s y s t e m s lie b e t w e e n the d i s s i p a t i v e berm where it would be expected a gradual a n d i n t e r m e d í a t e s y s t e m s . T h e h i g h w a v e decrease in the sediment size (Table 4). climate events that occurred in January and Sand samples are moderately well sorted M a y of 2 0 0 6 (Fig. 4) are responsible for a according to Friedman (1962) classification. general c h a n g e in S '. Rita, Azul and Foz d o u S t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s h o w s little v a r i a t i o n Lizandro beach systems towards dissipative w h e n all c a m p a i g n s are a n a l y s e d ( 0 , 6 1 6 - morphology (Fig. 4 . Tables 5 and 6). 0.779). Foz do Lizandro beach has the wider D e c e m b e r - J a n u a r y r e s u l t s s h o w that r a n g e in t h e s a m p l e d i s p e r s i ó n m e a s u r e Sta. Rita evolved from low tide terrace with (0.616 in the tidal terrace: 0.739 in the base b e r m f o r m a t i o n to q u a s i - d i s s i p a t i v e of the beach face: 0.755 in the beach face; behaviour. T h e general decrease in ¡; vàlues h 0,733 in the berm) in contrast with Sta. Rita ( T a b l e 5 ) f r o m t h e p r e - s t o r m t o s t o r m which reveáis the highest h o m o g e n e i t y both c o n d i t i o n s . e s p e c i a l l y d u e to H a n d L h ü in m e a n ( T a b l e 4) and s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n i n c r e a s e . reflects an a m p l i f i c a r o n of w a v e measures (0,695 in the tidal terrace; 0,722 in energy dissipation along s u b m e r g e d profiles t h e b a s e of t h e b e a c h f a c e ; 0 . 7 4 5 in t h e and an d e c r e a s e in the e n e r g y ' s reflection beach face; 0.733 in the berm). o v e r t h e b e a c h s y s t e m . as c l o s u r e d e p t h m o v e s away from the shoreline. T h e s a m e response w a s not observed in 5. Discussion M a y c a m p a i g n s ( F i g . 4) as b e a c h p r o f i l e r e a c h e d o n l y r h y t h m i c b a r a n d b e a c h Although a wave breaker type and beach behaviour. In fact, for similar offshore storm profile c o n t i n u u m occur in natural beachcs. v à l u e s ( F i g . 3) Q is m u c h l o w e r in M a y . Table 5. Surf similarity index parameterization ), based on w a v e data from Leixòes buoy. S P - spilling breakers: SG - surging breakers. S"\\ Ritu beach Azul l·i'iit'li Foz du [.¡/andró htach .v //, /.. •V H,. L„ ft, i' H, L„ Çh (U864 0.387!) 11.5472 Pre-storm 0.(1512 ().7.( 4 2 . Is 0.0514 0.74 4 2 . IS 0 . 0 7 2 5 0.74 4 2 . 1 5 January SI' SP SG S l u r m 0,2X08 0,3373 0.2641 0 . 0 4 " 2 2.02 71.SI 0 . 0 5 6 7 2.02 7131 0.11444 2.02 "1.51 SP SP SI' 0.6470 (1.4656 0,5409 Pre-storm 0.0988 1.09 4Í..74 0.0711 46.74 0.0826 1.0') 46.74 s o M i n SG SG 0,3480 Storm 0 . 0 5 9 6 1,62 55.26 0,1985 0,3510 SP 0.0.140 1,62 5 5 . 2 6 0.0601 1.62 55.26 SP SP 32 Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach response lo lügh energy wave chínate. T r i n d a d e , J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r u . A. y N e v e s . M . Field observations revealed the presence of M a y s t o r m e v e n t s are c o n s i s t e n t with the one longshore bar in January whilst in May m á x i m u m s e d i m e n t b u d g e t v a r i a b i l i t y t h e r e w e r e at l e a s t t w o b a r s p r e s e n t . e x p r e s s e d in T a b l e 4 . w h e r e h i g h e r A c c o r d i n g to Battjes ( 1 9 7 4 ) classification. v a r i a b i l i t y of J a n u a r y s t o r m the wave type for the two high w a v e climate ( 1 . 0 9 3 , 2 6 1 m / m ) is c o n t r a s t i n g with l o w e r 3 conditions w a s the spilling breaker. given as M a y v a l u e ( 2 9 8 . ( ) 9 7 m / m ) . F u r t h e r m o r e , , s t o r m in T a b l e 5 . S p i l l i n g b r e a k e r s a r e sediment size variations across beach profile usually associated with steep incident w a v e s c o n f i r m t h i s t e n d e n c y . A n i n c r e a s e in (= H a L ) and low gradient beach profiles J a n u a r y m e a n s e d i m e n t size b e t w e e n p r e - h h that play a significant role in w a v e e n e r g y storm and storm data (Table 4) is noted on d i s s i p a t i o n . T h e p r e s e n c e of m u l t i - b a r r e d the base of the beach face and on the beach s u b m e r g e d p r o f i l e a n d v e r y well d e f i n e d face ( B B F - ().37()mm to 0 , 5 2 7 m m ; B F - crescentic b e r m s in S . Rita pre-storm M a y 0 . 3 4 8 m m to 0 . 3 6 3 m m ) . w h i c h d i r e c t l y t a m o r p h o l o g y ( F i g . 4 ) a c t e d as a buffer to reflects a rise in the e n e r g è t i c levéis. M a y w a v e e n e r g y a n d to o n s h o r e s e d i m e n t results reveal the opposite tendency. with a t r a n s p o r t , r e s t r i c t i n g b e a c h p r o f i l e p r o - d e c r e a s e in m e a n s a n d s i z e b e t w e e n p r e - gression towards fully dissipative behaviour. storm and storm conditions. The differentiated Q valúes for January and Santa Rita beach - - P M 7 . 1 2 - 2 0 0 5 i i P2. 17.) 2-2005. - , P3.17-12-2005. ^ ' v. P4.17-12-2005. v" '-7», P5.17-12-2005. - P l . 0 4 - 0 1 - 2 0 0 5 . - P l . 1 4 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . 2i04-01-2OO6i . ] O 4 ^ S > f c ^ V i . P2-14-05-2006. P3.04-01-2006' £l ' " ~ \\ \\ F3.14-05-2006. • P4i04-0)-2006. ! ^ \\ P4.14-05-2006. 2 P5.04-01-2006. X V' P5.14-05-2006. • - P l . 16-12-2005. P:. i6-t;-roc6. P 3.16-12-2005. - - - P4i IÓ-I:-:C-05. £ 3 p;>. 16-12-2005. PÒ. 16-12-2005. - - P l . 26-05- 2006* V \\ P2.2S-05-2006. ^ P3< 28-05-2006. \\ V P4,2S-05-2006' \\ \\ P5.2S-05-2006^ Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s , M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. Jü^. Azul beach P 1.26-05-2006. P 2 . 2 6 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . P 3 . 2 6 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . P 4 . 2 6 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . P 5 . 2 6 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . P6.26-05-200.3. —- 40 6 0 80 100 120 140 160 ISO I D Foz do Lizandro beach 7 I _ ~\\__ - - P l . 15-12-2005. 6 • P2. 15-12-20051 5 • P 3 . 1 5 - 1 2 - 2 0 0 5 . i i P4. 15-12-2005. i 3 •. - — \\ .»„ P 5 . 1 5 - 1 2 - 2 0 0 5 . = 1 - o • -1 • 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 SO 100 2 0 140 160 ISO 2 0 0 m ~ \\ ^ - - P 1.03-01-2006. P 2 . 0 3 - O I - 2 0 0 6 . P 3 . 0 3 - 0 1 - 2 0 0 6 . P 4 . 0 3 - 0 1 - 2 0 0 6 . P 5 . 0 3 - 0 I - 2 0 O 6 . 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 SO tOO 120 140 160 ISO 2 0 0 m „ 7 -~~ - - P l . 1 2 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . 6 • P2. 1 2 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . 5 • ~- > P3. 1 2 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . - 4 1 " ^ ^ P 4 . 1 2 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . í 3 - " "~ - X -^ P5. 12-05-2006. \\ = 1 0 • \\ ~ ~- - -1 - - - - 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 3 0 100 120 140 1 6 0 130 2 0 0 ni — - - P 1 . 2 5 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 P 5 . 2 5 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 P 3 . 2 5 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 P 4 . 2 5 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 ' P 5 . 2 5 - 0 5 - 2 0 0 6 . . . — , — ^ ••,-*:•».. 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 SO 100 120 140 160 ISO 2 0 0 m Figure 4, Beach profile sequence in Sta. Rita, Azul and Foz d o Lizandro. 34 Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach response lo high energy wave climate.. T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s . M . E x c e p t i o n m a d e f o r m o r e e n e r g è t i c ( 0 , 3 3 7 3 - J a n u a r y s t o r m : 0 . 1 9 8 5 - M a y and/or durable storms it can be a s s u m e d that storm) indícate high dissipative behaviour of t h e i n t e r m e d í a t e m o r p h o d y n a m i c state of t h e s u b m e r g e d b e a c h a n d w a s a m a j o r longshore bar-trough is the limit response to contribution to the lowest m e a n variability high h y d r o d y n a m i c events. The modal state of J a n u a r y (-1 0 1 . 4 9 7 m / m l a n d M a y : , of m o r p h o d y n a m i c b e h a v i o u r d u r i n g low- ( 8 9 , 7 6 9 m / m - ) sediment budgets (Table 4). e n e r g y w a v e c l i m a t e w a s f o u n d to be the This fact d o e s n ' t necessary mean a less low tide terrace. d y n a m i c system w h e n c o m p a r e d to the other Azul beach m o r p h o l o g y ranged from low t w o b e a c h e s . D i m e n s i o n l e s s fall v e l o c i t y tide t e r r a c e in p r e - s t o r m m e a s u r e m e n t s to p a r a m e t e r v a l ú e s a n d i t ' s c o r r e s p o n d e n l l o n g s h o r e b a r - t r o u g h in J a n u a r y and trans- classification (Wright and Short. 1984) and verse bar and rip in M a y . as a r e s p o n s e to t h e o b s e r v e d b a r n u m b e r a l o n g t h e f o u r the respective storm events (Table 6). Field c a m p a i g n s d e n o t e h i g h m o r p h o l o g i c a l o b s e r v a t i o n s r e v e a l e d a d e c r e a s e in t h e d y n a m i c s of the s u b m e r g e d beach profile. n u m b e r of b a r s f r o m p r e - s t o r m to s t o r m A z u l b e a c h m o d a l s t a t e of m o r p h o - m o r p h o l o g y . In D e c e m b e r . t h e p r e - s t o r m d y n a m i c b e h a v i o u r ( l o w tide t e r r a c e ) and s u b m e r g e d m o r p h o l o g y i n c l u d e d o n e b a r l i m i t c o n d i t i o n s u n d e r s t o r m i n f l u e n c e indirectly o b s e r v e d t h r o u g h the n u m b e r of ( l o n g s h o r e b a r - t r o u g h ) can be a s s u m e d as consistent breaker lines present during low being similar to Sta. Rita beach. t i d e . T h i s b a r d i s a p p e a r e d a f t e r J a n u a r y Unlike S . Rita and Azul beach. Foz do I a storm. A two bar system was also found in Lizandro beach reached the fully dissipative M a y pre-storm conditions. This bar system m o r p h o d y n a m i c behaviour in January storm w a s reduced to one transversal bar after late event and the range of Q valúes indícate the May high w a v e event. full s p e c t r u m of i n t e r m e d í a t e t y p e s a r e T h e existence of a barred system in M a y present (Table 6). o b s e r v a t i o n s a l o n g w i t h l o w v a l ú e s of Table 6. Dimensionless fall velocity parameterization (Í3). D - dissipative: L B T - longshore bar-trough: R B B - rhythmic bar and beach: T B R - transverse bar and rip: L T T - low tide terrace. S"'. Rila liiaih A/.ul beach Foz do Lizandro lu-ach W„ T W. Q H. T 11. Q «.. 7 11. í? 2,0160 1,8833 2.0744 lYe-Slorin 0.74 5.17 ().(I7| 0.-4 5.17 0.076 0.74 5.17 0.06») .lamían LTT LTT LTT Storm 5.4572 4.9205 5.8853 2.02 6.73 0.055 2.02 6.73 0.061 2.02 6 7 3 0.051 l.B! LB 1 11 2.6716 2.4435 3.1307 I'rc-Slonn | .09 5.44 0.075 1.09 5.44 0.082 1.09 5.44 0.064 Maj LIT LTT TBR Storm 4.1886 3.3307 5.1195 1.62 5.S6 0.1166 1.62 5.86 0.083 1.62 5.86 0.054 RBB ! BK LUÍ Territoris, n ú m . 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 35 T r i n d a d e , J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s . M. Beach response to high energy wave climate. At Foz do Lizandro. the high variability W r i g h t and S h o r t m o r p h o d y n a m i c m o d e l . in m o r p h o d y n a m i c states is consistent with S t a . R i t a a n d A z u l b e a c h h a v e t h e s a m e the h i g h e r v a l ú e s of m á x i m u m s e d i m e n t modal m o r p h o d y n a m i c b e h a v i o u r (low tide b u d g e t c h a n g e s o v e r the four c a m p a i g n s terrace) as well as the similar response limit ( 1 2 8 9 . 5 0 3 m / m i n J a n u a r y a n d to storm c o n d i t i o n s (longshore b a r - t r o u g h I . I 5 2 3 , 1 2 8 m / m in M a y . ( T a b l e 4 ) . T h i s F o z d o L i z a n d r o r e v e a l e d n o m o d a l m o r - 3 system is smaller and. unlike the other beach p h o d y n a m i c b e h a v i o u r a n d r e a c h e d fully s y s t e m s . beach m o r p h o l o g y is c o n d i t i o n e d dissipative conditions during January storm not only by wave climate but also by direct event. r i v e r h y d r o d y n a m i c s d u r i n g w i n t e r . T h e T h e Q parameter s h o w e d good predictive L i z a n d r o river flows in the s o u t h e r n m o s t r e s u l t s w h e n c o m p a r e d to t h e o b s e r v e d sector of the beach (Fig. 2) and in high water beach m o r p h o l o g y . episodes can flood and erode the beach and Results reveal the high potential of beach the backshore profile. This c o m b i n e u fluvial monitoring p r o g r a m m e s in the prediction of and marine h y d r o d y n a m i c s probably explain local s y s t e m b e h a v i o u r s u n d e r h i g h w a v e the higher volume and parameter variability e v e n t s a n d . t h e r e f o r e . in p o t e n t i a l b e a c h recorded in this system. d a m a g e by storms. B e c a u s e of this h i g h v a r i a b i l i t y in the beach profile it w a s not possible to charac- terize modal b e h a v i o u r of Foz do L i z a n d r o References b e a c h . M o r e w a v e . m o r p h o l o g i c a n d s e - d i m e n t data is n e e d e d to fully u n d e r s t a n d A N F U S O . G . & B E N A V E N T E . .1. this system d y n a m i c s . (2006): A p p r o x i m a t i o n to the classification a n d m o r p h o d y n a m i c b e h a v i o u r of t h e beaches between C h i p i o n a and Rota (Cádiz, 6. Conclusión S W Spain): Ciencias Marinas. 32 (4). p. 605 - 6 1 6 Beach morphology dynamics depends. in B A P T I S T A . P. ( 2 0 0 6 ) : O sistema de the first p l a c e , on the v a r i a t i o n s of w a v e posicionainento global aplicado ao estudo e n e r g y r e a c h i n g the c o a s t . n a m e l y d u r i n g de litorals arenosos: Tese de D o u t o r a m e n t o . storms. and secondly on sediment availability Universidade de Aveiro, 278 p. to l'ulíill l o s s l'rom h i g h h y d r o d y n a m i c B A T T J E S . J. ( 1 9 7 4 ) : S u r f s i m i l a r i t y ; events. Proceedings of the I4th International P a r a m e t e r i z a t i o n of data c o l l e c t e d with Conference on Coastal Engineering. A S C E . regular beach profile monitoring c a m p a i g n s p. 4 6 6 - 4 8 0 is a useful tool to predict and valídate beach B E N A V E N T E . J . . D E L R Í O . L . . b e h a v i o u r . T h e use of the surf s i m i l a r i t y A N F U S O , G „ G A R C I A . F. & R E Y E S . J. i n d e x iç ) ( 2 0 0 2 ) : U t i l i t y of m o r p h o d y n a m i c h a n d t h e d i m e n s i o n l e s s fal l v e l o c i t y p a r a m e t e r s a l l o w e d d i f f e - characteri/.ation in the p r e d i c t i o n of b e a c h rentiating between the three beach systems" d a m a g e by s t o r m s : Journal of Coastal b e h a v i o u r before and right after t w o high Research. SI36. ICS Proceedings, p. 56 - 64 w a v e e v e n t s that o c c u r r e d in J a n u a r y and B E N E D E T . L.. F I N K L . C. & K L E I N . A. M a y 2 0 0 6 . F i e l d d a t a p a r a m e t e r i z a t i o n ( 2 0 0 4 ) : M o p h o d y n a m i c c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of a l l o w e d e s t a b l i s h i n g m o d a l b e h a v i o u r and b e a c h e s on the A t l a n t i c c o a s t of F l o r i d a : limit r e s p o n s e to high w a v e climate within g e o g r a p h i c a l v a r i a b i l i t y of b e a c h t y p e s . 36 Territoris, núm. 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 Beach response ta high energy wave climate. T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s . M . beach safety and coastal hazards; Journal of H A L L E R M E I E R . R. J. ( 1 9 8 1 a ) : Coastal Research. SI39. P r o c e e d i n g s of the T e r m i n a l settling velocity of c o m m o n l y sand 8th International Coastal S y m p o s i u m grains. S e d i m e n t o l o g y , 2 8 . p. 859 - 865 B E N E D E T . L . . F I N K L . C . H A L L E R M E I E R . R. J. ( 1 9 8 1 b ) : Fall C A M P B E L L . T . & K L E I N . A . ( 2 0 0 4 ) : velocity of beach sumís. Coastal Engineering Predicting the effect of beach n o u r i c h m e n t T e c h n i c a l N o t e . C E T N - B - 4 . C o a s t a l and cross-shore sediment variation on beach E n g i n e e r i n g R e s e a r c h C e n t e r . U . S . A r m y m o r p h o d y n a m i c a s s e s s m e n t : Coastal Engineer W a t e r w a y s E x p e r i m e n t Station. Engineering, 5 1 , p . 839 - 861 V i c k s b u r g . 2 p. B E T T E N C O U R T . P. & A N G E L O . C . H E N R I Q U E S . R. ( 2 0 0 4 ) : ( 1 9 9 2 ) : F a i x a c o s t e i r a C e n t r o - O e s t e S E D M A C / S E D P C : A n a p p l i c a t i o n to ( E s p i n h o - N a z a r é ) : E n q u a d r a m e n t o g e o m o r - s u p p o r t p a r t i c l e s i z e a n a l y s i s of f o l ó g i c o e e v o l u ç à o r e c e n t e : Geonovas. A unconsolidated sediments: 32nd Interna- Geologia e o ambiente. N ú m e r o Especial 1. tional Geological Congress, A b s . Vol., pt. 1. Lisboa, p. 7 - 30 abs. 154-6. p. 726 C A R V A L H O . F. ( 2 0 0 4 ) : T e m p o r a i s no K O M A R . P. ( 1 9 9 8 ) - Beach processes m a r d a r e g i à o c o s t e i r a d e P o r t u g a l and sedimentat ion. Prentice Hall. 544 p. c o n t i n e n t a l , in A l v e i r i n h o D i a s . J. & K O M A R . P. & G A U G H A N . M. (1972): F e r r e i r a . O. Methods for determining and Airy wave theory and breaker height representing coastal hazards: U n i v e r s i d a d e p r e d i c t i o n : Proceedings of the I3rd d o A l g a r v e . p. 34 - 35 Conferénce on Coastal Engineering. A S C E . C A R V A L H O . M . ( 1 9 9 2 ) : V a l o r e s p. 4 0 5 - 4 1 8 e x t r e m o s de agitaçào marítima (Figueira da Foz). T r a t a m e n t o local dos d a d o s existentes: L A R A N G E I R O . S.. O L I V E I R A . F. & Rel. 13/92 - A. PO-WAVES, 1H - LNEC: F R E I R É . P . ( 2 0 0 2 ) : N u m é r i c a ! 108 p. c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n of the l o n g s h o r e s e d i m e n t C O S T A . C . ( 1 9 9 4 ) : W i n d w a v e d y n a m i c s at B u a r c o s B e a c h . W e s t coast of c l i m a t o l o g y of the p o r t u g u e s e c o a s t . Final Portugal: Littoral 2002. The changing coast. report of sub-project A: Rel. 6/94 - A. PO- E U R O C O A S T - E U C C . porto, p. 369 - 374 WAVES. IH-LNEC. 79 p. M A S S E L I N K . G. & H E G G E . B. (19951: F E R R E I R A . Ó. ( 1 9 9 8 ) : M o r f o d i n á m i c a M o r p h o d y n a m i c s of m e s o - and m a c r o t i d a l d e p r a i a s e x p o s t a s : a p l i c a ç à o a o s e c t o r beaches: e x a m p l e s from central Q u e e n s l a n d . c o s t e i r o d e A v e i r o - C a b o M o d e g o : Australia: Marine Geology. 129. p. 1 - 2 3 Dissertaçào de D o u t o r a m e n t o . Universidade M A S S E L I N K . G . & H U G H E S . M . do A l g a r v e . 337 p. ( 2 0 0 3 ) : Introduction to coastal processes F R I E D M A N . G. ( 1 9 6 2 ) : O n s o r t i n g . and geomorphology; H o d d e r A r n o l d r e s s . sorting coefficients. and the lognormality of 3 5 4 p. t h e g r a i n - s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n of s a n d s t o n e s : M U N K . W . ( 1 9 4 9 ) : T h e solitary w a v e Journal of Geology, V. 70. p. 737 - 753 theory and its applications to surf p r o b l e m s : F R I E D M A N . G . & S A N D E R S . J. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. ( 1 9 7 8 ) : Principies of sedimentology; J o h n n° 51 (3). p. 376 - 4 2 4 Wiley & Sons. U.S.A.. 792 p. N E V E S . M. (2004): Evoluçào actual dos G O O D F E L L O W . B. & S T E P H E N S O N . litarais radiosos da Eslreinadura Norte. W . ( 2 0 0 5 ) : B e a c h m o r p h o d y n a m i c s in a Estado de Geoinorfologia: P h D T e s e de strong-wind bay: a low-energy e n v i r o n m e n t ? Doutoramento. Universidade de Lisboa. 554 p. Marine Geology, 2 1 4 , p. 1 0 1 - 1 1 6 37 T r i n d a d e . J.. R a m o s - P e r e i r a . A. y N e v e s . M . Beach response to high energy wave climate. O L I V E I R A . L . V A L L E . A . & ondulaçào na plataforma continental M I R A N D A . F. (1982): Littoral p r o b l e m s in portuguesa: T e s e de M e s t r a d o . Universidade t h e p o r t u g u e s e W e s t c o a s t : Coastal de Lisboa. 126 p. Engineering Proceedings. vol. III. p. 1950 - T A B O R D A . R. & D Í A S . J. A. ( 1 9 9 2 ) : 1969 A n á l i s e d a S o b r e e l e v a ç à o d o M a r d e O L I V E I R A P I R E S . H ( 1 9 8 9 ) : A l g u n s O r i g e m M e t e o r o l ó g i c a d u r a n t e o s a s p e c t o s d o c l i m a de a g i t a ç à o m a r í t i m a de T e m p o r a i s de F e v e r e i r o / M a r ç o d e 1978 e i n t e r e s s e p a r a a n a v e g a ç à o n a c o s t a d e D e z e m b r o d e 1981. Geonovas, I. p. 89-97 P o r t u g a l . O clima de Portugal: F a s e . T R I N D A D E . J . . P E R E I R A . A . R. & X X X V I I . vol 2. I N M G . Lisboa. 34 p. M E T R O G O S . R. ( 2 0 0 6 ) : A q u i s i ç à o d e O L I V E I R A P I R E S . H. & C A R V A L H O . d a d o s s o b r e a d i n á m i c a d e p r a i a s era F. (1996): Fundamento e características do d i v e r s a s e s c a l a s t e m p o r a i s . E x e m p l o s d o modelo de ondas de terceira geraçào l i t o r a l d a E x t r e m a d u r a : Publicaçdes da MAR3G. Instituto de M e t e o r o l o g i a : Lisboa. Associaçào Portuguesa de Geomorfólogos. 38 p. Vol. III. p. 8 5 - 9 1 . P A S S E G A . R. ( 1 9 5 7 ) : T e x t u r e a s T R I N D A D E . J.. P E R E I R A . A . R.. c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of elàstic d e p o s i t i o n : A A P G N E V E S . M.. B O R G E S . B. & P A I X À O . R. Bull. 4 1 . p. 1952 - 1974 (2007): M o n i t o r i z a ç à o da morfodinámica de P E R E I R A . A. R. ( 1 9 8 7 ) : A s p e c t o s da p r a i a s c o m d G P S e E s t a ç à o T o t a l . e v o l u ç à o d o relevo de Portugal. Litoral entre C o m p a r a ç à o de resultados: Publicaçdes da a s e r r a d e S i n t r a e a p r a i a d e S. J u l i à o Associaçào Portuguesa de Geomorfólogos. (Ericeira): Finisterra. XXII (44). p. 4 2 3 - 4 3 4 Vol. V. p. 293 - 3 0 1 . P E R E I R A . A. R. ( 1 9 9 1 ) : A m a r g e m V I D I N H A . J . . A N D R A D E . C . & c o n t i n e n t a l p o r t u g u e s a . B r e v e s í n t e s e d o T E I X E I R A . S. (1997): Análise morfológica c o n h e c i m e n t o actual: Finisterra. 5 1 . Lisboa, d o c o r d á o d u n a r e n t r e E s p i n h o e o C a b o p. 1 4 9 - 185 M o n d e g o ( P o r t u g a l ) : /// Colectánea de P E R E I R A . A. R. (1999): A importancia ideias sobre a zona costeira de Portugal. d o c o n h e c i m e n t o d o c l i m a d e a g i t a ç à o A s s o c i a ç à o E U R O C O A S T - P o r t u g a l . marítima na planificaçào de obras costeiras. Porto, pp. 391 - 4 1 6 . O e x e m p l o de Sines. in A. R a m o s Pereira. W E I S H A R . L. & B Y R N E . R. ( 1 9 7 8 ) : C é s a r A n d r a d e . M a r i a C o n c e i ç à o F r e i t a s . M á x i m u m b r e a k e r h e i g h t ; Journal of M a r i o N e v e s . J o r g e T r i n d a d e . A n a b e l a Waterways. Harbours and Coastal C r u c e s e A n a Maria V i e g a s . Livro - Guia da Engineering División. A S C E . n° 9 8 . p. 5 2 9 - visita de estado ao litoral entre S. André e 548 Vila Nova de Milfontes: E U R O C O A S T - W R I G H T . L. & S H O R T . A. ( 1 9 8 4 ) : Portugal M o r p h o d y n a m i c variability of b e a c h e s and T A B O R D A . R. ( 1 9 9 3 ) : Modelaçào da surf zones, a synthesis; Marine Geology, 56. dinámica sedimentary induzida pela p. 9 2 - 118. 38 Territoris, núm. 7. 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8 |